RESILIENT BANKING IN UNCERTAIN TIMES: A COMPARATIVE PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS OF BSI AND BTN IN SUPPORTING AN INCLUSIVE ASEAN ECONOMY

Authors

  • Yuda Septia Fitri UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung Author
  • Rio Septian UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung Author
  • Yulia Fithriany Rahmah UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung Author
  • Faiza Zahirotul Haq UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung Author
  • Mila Badriyah UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54783/b6mevr84

Keywords:

Comparative banking performance; Efficiency structure theory; Independent samples t-test; Financial performance analysis; Sharia-compliant finance.

Abstract

This study aims to conduct a comparative analysis of profitability between PT Bank Syariah Indonesia Tbk (BSI) and PT Bank Tabungan Negara (Persero) Tbk (BTN) during the 2021–2023 period. It evaluates seven profitability ratios as Operating Profit Margin, Net Profit Margin, Return on Assets, Return on Equity, Return on Investment, Return on Sales, and Earnings per Share, to assess the financial efficiency and managerial effectiveness of state-owned banks operating under fundamentally different systems: Islamic and conventional banking. Adopting a positivist quantitative paradigm, the study uses a comparative approach based on secondary data from audited financial statements. Descriptive statistics, normality tests, and the Independent Samples T-Test are applied in SPSS 31 to determine whether significant differences in the two banks’ profitability indicators. Empirical results reveal that BSI consistently outperforms BTN in most profitability measures, particularly OPM, NPM, ROA, ROI, and ROS, reflecting stronger cost efficiency and operational management. BTN, however, records higher Earnings per Share, suggesting greater shareholder value generation. The t-test confirms statistically significant differences in five of the seven indicators (p < 0.01), supporting the Efficiency Structure Theory as an explanatory framework. These findings emphasize the importance of cost control, digital transformation, and post-merger integration for enhancing Islamic bank profitability. Regulators and policymakers should promote efficiency-driven policies to sustain financial competitiveness across both banking models. This research provides novel, post- merger evidence on comparative profitability within Indonesia’s dual banking system. It enriches the Islamic banking literature by empirically validating the relevance of efficiency-based theories in emerging markets.

References

1. Abdelsalam, O., & Elghuweel, M. I. (2023). Determinants of Islamic bank profitability and risk: Evidence from emerging economies. International Review of Financial Analysis, 88, 102–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102137

2. Almutairi, H. A. (2022). COVID-19 and its impact on the financial performance of Kuwaiti banks: A comparative study between conventional and Islamic banks. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 9(1), 249–257.

3. Alqahtani, F., & Mayes, D. G. (2022). Revisiting the financial resilience of Islamic banks: Evidence from the COVID-19 period. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 79, 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2022.101124

4. Bank Indonesia. (2023). Indonesia Sharia Banking Outlook 2023. https://www.bi.go.id/

5. Berger, A. N. (1995). The profit–structure relationship in banking: Tests of market-power and efficient- structure hypotheses. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 27(2), 404–431. https://doi.org/10.2307/2077868

6. Berger, A. N., & Hannan, T. H. (1998). The efficiency cost of market power in the banking industry: A test of the quiet life and related hypotheses. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(3), 454–465. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557555

7. Dusuki, A. W., & Abdullah, N. I. (2007). Maqasid al-Shari‘ah, Maslahah, and corporate social responsibility. The American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences, 24(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.35632/ajiss.v24i1.406

8. Elnahass, M., Kabir, R., & Trinh, V. Q. (2021). Global banking stability in the shadow of COVID-19: The role of regulation, profitability, and efficiency. Finance Research Letters, 43, 102112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102112

9. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.

10. Ghouse, G., Khan, M. S., & Rehman, W. (2022). Islamic versus conventional banks: Resilience and profitability in post-pandemic markets. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 13(4), 897–915. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-07-2021-0181

11. Haniffa, R., & Hudaib, M. (2019). A theoretical framework for Islamic corporate governance. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 10(2), 150–171.

https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-09-2017-0136

12. Humairah, N. (2023). Determinants of Profitability in Indonesian Islamic Banks. https://dspace.uii.ac.id

13. Hussain, H., & Hassan, M. K. (2022). The impact of capital structure and risk on Islamic bank profitability. Research in International Business and Finance, 62, 101123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101123

14. Jubilee, R. V. W. (2021). Do Islamic versus conventional banks progress or regress in productivity?

SpringerOpen. https://link.springer.com

15. Khan, M., & Saba, I. (2022). Digital transformation and bank profitability: Evidence from Southeast Asia. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 180, 121160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121160

16. Koch, T. W., & MacDonald, S. S. (2015). Bank Management (8, Ed.). Cengage Learning.

17. Mensi, W., Vo, X. V., & Kang, S. H. (2022). Efficiency and profitability in Islamic and conventional banks: Evidence from emerging markets. Economic Modelling, 109, 105–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.105127

18. Miah, M. D., & Uddin, H. (2017). Efficiency and stability of Islamic and conventional banks: Evidence from the post-crisis period. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 47, 60–74.

19. Nahar, F. H. (2022). Efficiency in Islamic and Conventional Banking in Indonesia. https://repository.unair.ac.id

20. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2023). Indonesia Banking Statistics 2023. https://www.ojk.go.id/

21. PT Bank Syariah Indonesia Tbk. (2025). Bank Syariah Indonesia—Halaman Utama.

https://www.bankbsi.co.id/

22. PT Bank Tabungan Negara (Persero) Tbk. (2025). Bank BTN — Beranda. https://www.btn.co.id/

23. PT Bursa Efek Indonesia. (2025). IDX — Beranda. https://www.idx.co.id/

24. Rose, P. S., & Hudgins, S. C. (2013). Bank Management and Financial Services (9, Ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

25. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2019). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach(8, Ed.). Wiley.

26. Sobol, I., Chen, Y., & Suvorov, A. (2023). Bank profitability determinants: Evidence from emerging markets. Economic Modelling, 125, 106142.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106142

27. World Bank. (2024). Indonesia Financial Sector Assessment Report. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org

Downloads

Published

17-03-2026

How to Cite

RESILIENT BANKING IN UNCERTAIN TIMES: A COMPARATIVE PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS OF BSI AND BTN IN SUPPORTING AN INCLUSIVE ASEAN ECONOMY. (2026). Iqtishaduna : International Conference Proceeding, 2, 179-193. https://doi.org/10.54783/b6mevr84

Similar Articles

1-10 of 141

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.